Current:Home > StocksBrad Pitt Allegedly Physically Abused Angelina Jolie Before 2016 Plane Incident -FinTechWorld
Brad Pitt Allegedly Physically Abused Angelina Jolie Before 2016 Plane Incident
View
Date:2025-04-17 14:42:58
More details are emerging about Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie's past.
In a new April 4 court filing from Jolie—which regards the former couple's ongoing legal battle over their French winery Château Miraval—the Maleficent actress alleges Pitt was physically abusive to her before the infamous plane incident in 2016, after which Jolie filed for divorce.
"While Pitt's history of physical abuse of Jolie started well before the family's September 2016 plane trip from France to Los Angeles," the filing reads, "this flight marked the first time he turned his physical abuse on the children as well. Jolie then immediately left him."
Since the couple was declared legally separated in 2019, Pitt and Jolie have shared custody of their six children—Maddox, Pax, Zahara, Shiloh and twins Vivienne and Knox—who were each between the ages of 8 and 15 at the time of the alleged plane altercation.
E! News has reached out to reps for both Jolie and Pitt and hasn't received comment. However a source with knowledge of the litigation said, "This is a pattern of behavior—whenever there is a decision that goes against the other side they consistently choose to introduce misleading, inaccurate and/or irrelevant information as a distraction."
The source continued, "There was a lengthy custody trial that involved the entire history of their relationship and a judge who heard all the evidence still granted him 50/50 custody."
Regarding the 2016 plane incident, Pitt denied any abuse and the FBI closed its investigation by November 2016 with no charges against Pitt. In the same month, DCFS also concluded its investigation into the incident with no findings of abuse.
The legal battle over the former couple's Chateau Miraval began in 2022 when Pitt filed a February lawsuit against Jolie for allegedly selling her interests in the winery—a 1300-acre country estate the pair purchased in 2008—without his consent.
Jolie then filed a $250 million countersuit against the Bullet Train actor in September of that year, alleging he devised a campaign to "seize control" of the once-shared estate after their divorce. This lawsuit, obtained by E! News at the time, alleged—as does the April 4 filing—that Jolie only sold her portion of the estate to an outside company when Pitt refused to remove the NDA stipulations he'd included as part of the deal.
In response to the 2022 filing, a source close to Pitt told E! News that the lawsuit is "yet another rehash and repackaging of old material to try and distract from the other party's own behavior."
As the new April filing states, "The real reason the Miraval deal failed was Pitt's demand for an NDA to cover up his history of physical and emotional abuse of Jolie and their family."
"Thus, to defend herself, Jolie must gather the evidence necessary to demonstrate why Pitt demanded an NDA as a condition of buying Jolie's interest and why that demand ultimately served to scuttle the sale," it continues. "An important part of the 'why' is that Pitt was attempting to hide his history of abuse, control, and coverup."
The suit also expresses Jolie's regret at having to bring these details to light.
"Since Jolie filed for divorce in September 2016," the document states, "she has focused squarely on helping their family heal. As part of that focus, she steadfastly chose not to publicly disclose the details of Pitt's history of abuse and efforts to control her out of a wish to protect their family's privacy, and to respect Pitt as father of their children. It is extremely painful to Jolie to have to defend herself from Pitt's lawsuit."
For the latest breaking news updates, click here to download the E! News AppveryGood! (585)
Related
- The city of Chicago is ordered to pay nearly $80M for a police chase that killed a 10
- Judge says trial is required to decide government’s antitrust case over Google’s advertising tech
- Shoppers Say This Peter Thomas Roth Serum Makes Them Look Younger in 2 Days & It’s 60% off Right Now
- Report finds Colorado was built on $1.7 trillion of land expropriated from tribal nations
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Maps and photos show massive rainfall in Florida as flooded communities face ongoing downpours
- Jenelle Evans Shares Update on Her Kids After Breakup From “Emotionally Abusive” David Eason
- 2024 US Open leaderboard, scores, highlights: Rory McIlroy tied for lead after first round
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- Some Mexican shelters see crowding south of the border as Biden’s asylum ban takes hold
Ranking
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- Palestinian family recounts horror of Israel's hostage rescue raid that left a grandfather in mourning
- WWE Clash at the Castle 2024: Time, how to watch, match card and more
- Lena Dunham looks back on 'Girls' body-shaming: There is still 'resentment toward women'
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- G7 leaders tackle the issue of migration on the second day of their summit in Italy
- Roger Daltrey unveils explosive Who songs, covers with cheer and humor on solo tour
- Tom Brady’s Kids Jack, Benjamin and Vivian Look All Grown Up in Family Photos
Recommendation
As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
Sandy Hook families want to seize Alex Jones' social media accounts
Germany vs. Scotland UEFA Euro 2024 opening game in Munich: How to watch, rosters
Likes on X are now anonymous as platform moves to keep users' identities private
Pregnant Kylie Kelce Shares Hilarious Question Her Daughter Asked Jason Kelce Amid Rising Fame
Maps and photos show massive rainfall in Florida as flooded communities face ongoing downpours
Kylie Kelce Weighs in on Harrison Butker's Controversial Commencement Speech
Couples ask judge to find Alabama law that provides legal immunity to IVF providers unconstitutional